True/false and Yes/No both give the same meaning to oneway, so there's only debate if the value should be leaning towards human- or machine readability. Personally I would lean towards human, shame on any programmer who's software cannot parse yes/no values.
What would really add additional information to oneway is: 0, 1 and -1. These values additionally give a direction relative to the direction of the way. Imho only 0, 1 and -1 are the true options for the oneway tag. Richard Fairhurst wrote: > David Earl wrote: >> I can't help feeling the effort that I've noticed some contributors >> are putting into manually changing oneway=yes to oneway=true >> would be better spent doing something more useful. > > Eek - people are really doing this? > > 'yes' is English (and, as you say, in the editor presets). 'true' (in this > context) is computerprogrammerish. Even if there was a need to standardise, > which there isn't, it should be on the former. > > cheers > Richard _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
