sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote: >> David Earl wrote: >> > I can't help feeling the effort that I've noticed some contributors >> > are putting into manually changing oneway=yes to oneway=true >> > would be better spent doing something more useful. > > Well, JOSM->search->type:way oneway:true > A nice way to rest my brain. > >> Who's to say what the right answer is when there >> is no right answer. > > I pretend to know and say (again) that the right answer is not to have > duplicate tags for the same meaning. > > But, that's not that much about changing them for changing them I'm fighting > for, but for that : > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2009-January/006179.html > ( don't want to waste time translating, but get help from google translator if > you want to read my story ) > >> Eek - people are really doing this? > > I am
Whatever it is going to be: it would be nice if the validator plugin in JOSM will accept this. Currently it's programmed to accept yes/no as a proper tag and true/false is flagged as incorrect. That's why I change these tags to yes/no if I encounter them (with the validator). If I'm then in an editwar with Sylvain, I hope we can do it face to face with some wine and cheese ;) Regards, Maarten _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
