The legal council response to Use Case 1 says (in part) 'The ODbL
imposes no license restrictions on the Produced Works, although it
does restrict reverse engineering the Produced Work in order to re-
create the Database and place it under a different license.'
This says clearly that there is no restriction on the licence used by
Produced Works.
And section 4.7 of the licence says: For the avoidance of doubt,
creating a Produced Work, and then re- creating the whole or a
Substantial part of the Data found in this Database, a Derivative
Database, or a Database that is part of a Collective Database from the
Produced Work, is still subject to this Licence. Any product of this
type of reverse engineering activity (whether done by You or on Your
behalf by a third party) is governed by this License.
I have two questions:
1) Where in the licence does it say that a Produced Works can be
licenced any way one wants? Have I missed something obvious?
2) If one can produce a PD printed map from OSM data then how can one
impose restrictions on what someone can do with it or force people to
acknowledge the source? Possibly my legal knowledge is not up to it,
but I thought the whole thing about PD was that there were no
restrictions.
Regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
