Hi, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > What license would our data be under? Would it > be under no license because it's factual data that cannot be > copyrighted?
Grant wrote: > OSMFs legal counsel also recommends the use of the Factual Information > License http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/fil/ for the > individual contributions from individual data contributors, and any > aggregation covered by the ODbL. andrzej again: > In this case couldn't we just keep claiming that the > data is under CC-BY-SA and remain compatible with other projects (even > if this doesn't make a difference legally in most countries, because > it's factual data) Claiming to have a copyright where you know you have none is considered very bad style, something that evil companies do, or Scientology. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
