On 28/02/2009 12:21, 80n wrote: > So what percentage of *user contributed* data would other people feel > willing to see sacrificed in order to move forward with the new license?
I think I'd need to see what the data is rather than put it in percentage terms. For example, let's say we're going to lose lots of one way streets (that I mapped originally) in my area because user X went round changing them from 'yes' to 'true' and then decided they didn't agree with the license (or more likely weren't contactable any more), then I could in principle recreate these from my original data. Not that I want to spend time doing this, but if I had to I could. But in any case, I'd say 10% is too high. Even if it's 0.1% but it's all in my area because there's a particular individual working here blocking it, it's WAY too high and would destroy over two years of my work. Personally, if we lose anything that isn't easily remapped (i.e. almost zero work), I'd rather stick with the old license. Trouble is, I can't vote no once I've voted yes, but if I vote no initially, I'll be undermining everyone else. David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
