On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm surprised that nobody else seems to see a problem in this. Am I > perhaps barking up some completely imaginary tree? Nope, not at all, I'm exceptionally concerned about the implications on the cyclemap db. I'm combining PD SRTM data and OSM data, and as far as I'm concerned making both original sources available should be sufficient. That way every piece of geographic data used in the cyclemap is available. Being forced to offer a postgis dump would suck massively. And never mind for me - I've got the time and energy to deal with it if needs be. But it'll also suck for people doing things like my public transport experiments - as soon as you put up a picture of one of your experiments all of a sudden you'll have some guy demanding a dump of your postgis db. Seems overkill, and like you say, the intention should be to make the geographic data available, not the specific instance of (perhaps processed) data. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
