http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/*[highway=tertiary_link] -> 1.3mb file
Well, these seems to be quite a lot tertiary_links out there ... For example http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.95321&lon=11.57331&zoom=16 (not rendered though, you have to use some editor to see it) So I'd say we should have tertiary links too. Martin On 02/03/2009, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) <[email protected]> wrote: > Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > > > > Would adding also highway=tertiary_link be too much? :-) > > I'm not sure I can think of any examples in the areas I'm familiar with. > Perhaps that's just due to local road design though: link-like > structures seem to be reserved for faster, more multi-lane road designs. > > Not having link roads: a concrete criterion for highway=tertiary? :-) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
