Dave Stubbs wrote: > Am I missing something obvious, or am I just being sneaky in some > way? And is there a way it can be made more obvious in the license > if it's actually intended to be that way?
I think this is a serious error in the ODbL draft 0.9. (I believe Frederik is of the same opinion.) It wasn't the case in the previous draft of ODbL. I can only assume it was a drafting error in the revision. We raised it directly on the ODC list at http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/odc-discuss/2009-March/date.html cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ODbL%2C-Derivative-Databases---Produced-Works-tp22307257p22307343.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
