> Shaun wrote: > >> This crossing of a highway and a railway needs to >> be tagged as railway=level_crossing >> >> Is not quite right as it should also allow >> railway=crossing. a crossing is a crossing just for >> pedestrians, while level_crossing is a crossing where >> larger vehicles can cross too. >
Thank you, Shaun for the clarification! The check does allow 'railway=crossing' as well as 'railway=level_crossing', but it was not documented that way. I've added that now. > Hi Harald, > > Do you use the saved comments against false positives to improve the > checks at all? For example I noted against one such highlighted > problem that railway=abandoned meeting a highway=footway probably > doesn't need to be tagged as a level_crossing (indeed part of the > footway runs along a section of the abandoned railway line). Yes of course, I will use the comments! In fact that's the only purpost of the comment field. Thank you for the hint, I excluded abandoned railways by now. Please note that this change will take effect in the next but one update, as the check process is already running... > > Having said that I've found a few things to correct around here as > well as the false positives, and there are a few things that are > highlighted as places I meant to go and finish but forgot about... > > Ed > > Thank you, Harald _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
