On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Ed Avis <[email protected]> wrote: > Or if I might make a slightly different suggestion: keep the CC-BY-SA licence > because that's what we have, and it's the standard adopted by Wikipedia and > other collections of free content.
Not a helpful suggestion. It's been explained many times why sticking with CC-BY-SA on our geographical data set just isn't an option. These reasons are what spurred the initial considerations of changing the license all that time ago, and isn't something that's been undertaken lightly. If you're not up to speed on why, then please go find out. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
