Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > I really don't want to get into a long discussion about the licence, > but what I'm really missing is a rationale document, going through > each paragraph explaining why it says what it says. Because there are > things in there that I don't understand why they're there.
Me too. > > As an aside, Can we get something into the user accounts that allows > people to tick a box saying they agree to some kind of licence change. > ISTM the easiest way to finish the discussion about deleted data is to > get some actual figures as to how much of a problem it is. If it turns > out 99.8% of people agree then the question becomes moot. > I don't think this will necessarily help, as it doesn't give you the reasons people might not agree. In my case, I feel I am being told 'agree to this new license which we haven't fully explained by this deadline or we will delete your data'. If that really is the case, I would not agree to the change - not because I think it is a bad license, which I don't know, but because I don't like the process. Graham > Have a nice day, _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
