2009/3/4 Lars Aronsson <[email protected]>: > > The OSM wiki has a <map> tag that looks like this: > <map lat=63 lon=16.5 z=5 w=360 h=720 /> >
I think this (and the slippymap tag) are great, but I wonder if using "map" as a tag name is a good idea. HTML already has a map tag that means something else. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#h-13.6.1 ... obviously this is just a wiki extension and people can call it what they like, but it seems like a fantastic prototype for an html element that could be introduced the same way the <audio> and <video> tags are in the proposed html 5 standard. Using a name that wouldn't clash with html 4 would help there. Just thinking outloud, Tom. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
