Mike Collinson schrieb:
> Simone,
>
> The ODbL is still a "BY-SA" license but written with databases rather than
> creative works in mind ("ODC-BY-SA"). So my opinion is that Frederik's advice
> is the right one, it depends on how narrow or wide-ranging the original
> authority was.
>
> At the moment, we are simply trying to methodically establish where issues
> might exist.
I really like to see that this is done and especially that you let the
people know that are not on the legal-talk list :-)
There is no need to make formal contact ... a license change has neither
been decided nor made.
Right.
That's the main reason why I didn't already contacted the Frida data
owners about the license change. We currently just don't know when and
how the license will change.
That's also the reason why I'm a bit skeptical about the original
proposed time table for the license change, especially for the mappers.
For some it's not a "simple" yes/no decision, but like me they'll have
to ask others - and that just may take a while ;-)
Regards, ULFL
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
