On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Russ Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 24, 2009, at 11:48 AM, David Lynch wrote: >> I agree that checking the import is good, but I have my own issues >> with the "review" tag (having to "edit" something in order to indicate >> that it's correct is counter-intuitive, and unless you know it's there >> and remember to remove it/change the value, it's way easy to leave a >> false positive.) > > Maybe we need a keybinding in JOSM which removes the tag from the > selected way?
this would be ideal for a plugin, rather than core functionality. maybe some other tiger-related functionality could be bundled in, such as merging two identical ways where they're duplicated across county boundaries? > Perhaps we need a "reaper" which looks for ways which have > tiger:reviewed which aren't last edited by Dave Hansen? As you say, > if somebody edited it, then it's likely that the change was made to > fix a problem. It's possible that there are still remaining problems, > but ANYTHING in OSM can have errors. when i'm fixing tiger i often review a segment of a very long way and split it, setting (or removing) the tiger:reviewed tag on the part that i've checked. this means i am the "last edited" user on *both* parts of the split way, despite having reviewed only one of them. so the reaper would have to be a bit more sophisticated than just looking at the "last edited" user. cheers, matt _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
