On Wednesday 29 April 2009 14:57:06 Ed Loach wrote: > > It's a good job you pointed that out, I've always been led to > > believe > > it was mid-tide level and am going to do some tweaking of some > > coastlines soon. I'm sure there's either a wiki page or a list > > post > > suggesting it should be mid-tide somewhere. > > We should really have both a high tide and a low tide coastline, so > I can tag the natural=beach (or mud or whatever) bits between them > better. > > I've tweaked a number of coastlines around here based on traces I've > taken when walking along the seafront - mainly to push them far > enough out that I was walking on the wall and not in the sea. Oh, > and so that the marina car park was on dry land. I've called up the > imagery and in some cases it seems the coastlines have been traced > off what someone has guessed is the coastline, but can't tell dark > patches of saltmarsh or mud from water and in places is quite wrong. > > Ed > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Nothing on the tag:natural=coastline page says you can't tag anything on the sea-side of it. See <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=wetland> And then the extended usage: wetland=tidalflat wetland=saltmarsh wetland=mangrove -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
