On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Etienne Chové <[email protected]> wrote: > Eddy Petrișor a écrit : >> >> 2009/4/29 Etienne Chové <[email protected]>: >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PythonOsmApi >> >> BTW, under which license are publishing your changes? May I suggest >> one of 'LGPL', 'GPL v2 or later' or 'GPL v3 or later'? I would be fine >> with either of those, but I think LGPL would be the best choice for >> such code as a "library". > > Until now, all my publcations are GPLv3, and this one yet have it licence > header. I don't know differences with LGPL.
Basically LGPL allows building proprietary or non-GPLed apps linked with LGPL libraries, but in the case of Python modules I am unsure if that would really allow creating proprietary or non-GPLed apps since I am unsure if an import counts as linking. Either way I am fine with GPLv3, too. If you don't feel too strong about it, you might want to add a "or later" there to ease up possible future migrations to newer versions of the license. -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
