2009/5/23 Stanislav Brabec <[email protected]>: > It seems that mapping features lack stones. In a flat country, any > bigger stone has its local name and it is an important orientation > point. But OSM now lacks any classification and rendering of stones. If > you look at Stonehenge, you see just two points in the mapnik map. > > Some of stones use tourism=attraction, some use natural=stone > (unofficial), some of them use historic=monument or historic=memorial, > some use amenity=place_of_worship,religion=stone_age_druidic > or tourism=artwork. > > Let's try to classify it. Note that sometimes it is not possible to > decide the history of the stone and assign correct tag and we have to > consider it as a generic stone. > > I would like to propose a new tag for point (a stone), way (a line of > stones), and area (area with stones) >
What about Cairns http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cairn oh and Trig Points http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trig_point Get some mapping done using one all the better I guess.... (Unless that causes copyright problems .....) Peter Childs _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
