On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Richard Fairhurst<[email protected]> wrote: > Arguing over the presentation on the wiki isn't really the issue. What the > tags are, and how they're documented, are two separate things. But like Ævar > says, talk is cheap, and though many of us feel strongly that MediaWiki is a > rubbish solution (even discounting its performance issues) none of us have > as yet actually produced any code. Any devs out there looking for a project? >
I'm not talking about the whole wiki, just the "Map Features" page. This page presents all tags at same level of importance, from the highway=residential instanciated million times to highway=bus_guideway or railway=monorail instanciated ergh.. (don't know.. 3 times ?). I don't understand people saying it is not possible with the search function. How do they use wikipedia ? they have a single page listing all articles listed in alphabetic order ? About synonyms, you can also improve the descriptions to include these terms or use the "REDIRECT" feature. I also don't like the position "why bother, it's chaotic, let them continue". I'm sure we can improve this page a bit more than "sort the amenities". Pieren _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
