Simon, I think you probably should be emailing this to CM. So have done so for you.
Cheers Andy >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:talk- >[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] >Sent: 02 July 2009 12:54 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [OSM-talk] Ensuring Cyclewyays/Footways are routable? > >I had a little play with Cloudmade's routing stuff and it wasn't quite >working for me..... > >http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=51.103306&lng=- >114.079413&zoom=15&directions=51.10050375773113,- >114.0750789642334,51.10594712658125,- >114.08280372619629&travel=foot&styleId=3697 > >Both foot and cycle routes take a long way around (car goes even further >thought an 'access=bus' section). > >How often is the route database updated? Cycle way through path was last >edited around the 19th June, but is not used in the route. > >Also in realality the park is also routeable, one could just walk up >Trafford Ave and over a bit of grass. Is it possible to tag so this can >happen? > > > >And on this one, it routes the bike slightly further: >http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=51.118516&lng=- >114.048493&zoom=16&directions=51.11576782135306,- >114.04864311218262,51.12080533765644,- >114.04978036880493&travel=bicycle&styleId=1714 > >If the start/end points are moved slightly it permits foot/cycles to go >both ways so it's not a tagging thing. What's going on? > >Cheers, >Mungewell. > > >_______________________________________________ >talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
