On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:20:51 +0200 Ben Laenen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Simon Wood wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:14:45 +0200 > > > > Ivo van den Maagdenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just noticed a marked scenic route for cars. Any suggestions for > > > the route tag fort the relation that could mark this kind of > > > routes? > > > > > > name=..., type=route, route=car > > > > I have been using: > > <tag k="route" v="road"/> > > <tag k="type" v="route"/> > > That would work, if it wasn't the case that those tags are now in use > for road number "routes", so all E-roads in Europe have a route=road > relation for example, and several countries have them for many more > road numbers. > > This is something completely different obviously. I'd say > route=motorcar would be a good option (to be consistent with existing > route=bicycle and route=foot for cycle and walking routes). > > Ben It is still a route through (several?) roads though. The 'network' key allows you to differentiate between E-roads, tourists routes, other country route numbers, etc. -- Joseph Booker
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
