Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Clearance

[John Smith]

--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> actually even though the definition in the wiki might not
> specify it
> unambigously and explicitly the current use of maxheight

These things should be explicitly stated, otherwise people interpret it 
differently :)

> (as discussed
> intensively at least on German ML) should be

That doesn't help anyone else not on that list.

> maxheight:legal, so I
> would encourage to put it the other way round:
> maxheight
> and
> maxheight:physical

Either way, expanding the existing tag makes more sense than creating 2 
differently named tags which will cause even more confusion and duplication.


      

_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk