On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:04:37 +0000 (GMT), John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > --- On Thu, 30/7/09, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > >> different". This, I would argue, is a reason to allow for >> the > > How much does the physical height exceed the legal height in most cases? > >> possibility to differentiate between maxheight:physical >> and >> maxheight:legal. > > If maxheight already implies the legal height there is no need to make > things convulted for the sake of it, otherwise we'd be typing > denomination=the_church_of_jesus_christ_of_latter-day_saints > For countries that have different signs for legal maxheight and physical maxheight, you can have a section of road preventing tall vehicles from passing, but they can still legally enter the road (and get stuck?!?). In most cases, it wouldn't be needed when the legal limit is in place, though (at least some) tunnels might have different heights depending on lane (the legal limit might be the central lane, and lower physical height in left and right lane). I am not trying to tag the difference between a catholic church, and a catholic church with a liberal priest, I am trying to tag what I see signed on roads. -- Brgds Aun Johnsen via Webmail
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
