--- On Mon, 3/8/09, SLXViper <slxvi...@gmx.net> wrote: > quadcopters/hexacopters/octocopters/microcopters equipped > with a camera > are much better than a satellite. Easier and cheaper to > use, and most > important: satellites give only rather poor quality images, > often with > lots of clouds... Digital orthophotos and the high > resolution imagery of > google (and others) are made from planes, not from > satellites.
Some sort of decently sized blimp would probably be cheaper to run and don't need to constantly use energy to stay above the ground. I wonder if you can get a cheap second hand blimp from somewhere... _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk