On 05/08/2009, at 10.09, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Maybe it makes sense to use a variation of the "motorcar" tag which is > already widely used to model car access (e.g. highway=tertiary, > motorcar=4wdonly - or even highway=tertiary, motorcar=no, > motorcar:4wd=yes or something)?
This is going in the wrong direction IMHO. There is no limit to the number of vehicles that could be defined in this way. What about armored_tanks=yes ? :-) I think it's a mistake to use tags that depend on anything but the terrain. For example, terrain=*. That would tell people what they want to know from a map, namely what the terrain is like, not what kind of vehicle someone thinks can go there. My 2 cents. Cheers, Morten _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
