--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's proposing highway=rural as something less
> significant than tertiary
> (bad, we already have unclassified for that), not something
> less significant
> than unclassified (good, we don't have anything like that
> in rural areas).
The distinction is that highway=rural isn't as well maintained, or has as much
traffic as highway=residential, so if residential is lower than unclassified,
then rural is lower than residential, but higher than track
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
