On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Lester Caine wrote: > Currently there SHOULD be a landuse/natural tag for each area on a map as > using amenity= creates another level of complexity. One may still has to > decide what to use for landuse if the tag itself is missing. I still think > 'landuse=natural' with a sub tag of natural= is the correct framework ...
Thanks everyone for the input. In this case I'm going with landuse=retail. The hotel itself is tagged building=yes, tourism=hotel. I suppose if a hotel is surrounded by commercial landuse then there's no point making a little retail island to hold it. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Joseph Scanlan +1-702-455-3679 http://www.n7xsd.us/ [email protected] (work) (not work) [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- So he went inside there to take on what he found. But he never escaped them, for who can escape what he desires? --Tony Banks of Genesis in "The Lady Lies" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
