> > I know that some people like this tidy-points-function to work on > TIGER-Data, but I tell you: if the TIGER-Data is not good/precise, it > won't get better using this function ;-)
bad data doesn't get worse either. for a lot of tiger data it can compact without any loss. And tiger is not a community created data. anyone improving it shouldn't be limited As long as someone verifies the results it's same like any other user input. Josm default is too aggressive tough. this should be definitely changed. > > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
