On 11/08/09 08:50, Roy Wallace wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Tom Hughes<t...@compton.nu> wrote: >> That's a completely ridiculous quorum when we have 10000 active mappers. >> If the process says that eight people can get together and tell >> thousands of people that they've been "doing it wrong" for the last five >> years and should start retagging everything according to some new scheme >> then the process is broken. > > What would you suggest? It is quite possible that the effect of > increasing the number of necessary votes will only result in slowing > down progress. Do you instead expect that it would increase the > quality of the accepted proposals? Or are you saying that new ways of > tagging things are just bad in general??
Well the hurdle to jump to change an existing tagging should certainly be much higher than the hurdle to introduce a new tag for something that hasn't been tagged before. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://www.compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
