2009/8/10 Gustav Foseid <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:21 PM, OJ W <[email protected]> wrote: >> isn't the issue here that radioactivity is like height, i.e. a >> smoothly-varying value that exists everywhere and is typically >> represented as gridded data (which gets converted to contours for >> display). > > Average yearly rainfall, air pollution, demographics,... The list goes on.
Out of OSM scope applied directly, but then for demographics you have populated places which we do map, for elevation we have natural=peaks which we map so it perhaps also makes sense to map places of extreme air pollution or extreme radiation i.e. the sources of them as was suggested. I can't imagine these being useful for navigation though, unless your car gps has a geiger counter... or the radiation is at a level where it can erase pictures from your analogue camera, flip bits on harddisks (and eventually produce heat on your skin). Cheers _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
