On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:24 AM, David Earl<[email protected]> wrote: > So what you're saying is that ... > - we have to massively increase the amount of data we store by saying > for every road that it is open 24 hours a day (because some aren't) and > has a 44 tonne weight limit (or whatever it is by default in your > country) except for the few cases where it isn't; all cycleways don't > permit llama pack animals (because some in Peru do) and all motorways > explicitly do or don't permit horse drawn vehicles.
I call red herring! (English idiom: a distraction) You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a bad thing??? Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority, but it IS a GOOD THING to have llama restrictions in the database. The core issue here (that I believe we agree on) is that if tags have inconsistent implications, they must be made explicit. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
