Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
>>>>> highway=footway (not suitable)
>>>>> bicycle=dedicated (signed)
>>>> A footway for cycling is not a valid combination to me.
>>
>> why not? In Germany: sign footway + additional sign: "Fahrräder frei"
>That's yes, not designated.
Silly question, maybe: but, what does "yes" actually mean? Everyone seems
to use it differently; it was intended originally for a legal right but in
practice has been used in a range of scenarios. In this particular case
("Fahrräder frei" marked footways), do cyclists have a *legal* right to
use the footway, or is it an unoffical, revokable right? If the former,
"designated" would seem appropriate; if the latter "permissive" would seem
the most appropriate.
Nick
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
