On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:43 AM, John Smith<[email protected]> wrote: > > Most data in historic information is very tiny areas, most of the data will > be only current information.
It seems we have different ideas about the scope of this proposal, then. I thought the implication was that in the future, if something that has been mapped ceases to exist, it should not be deleted, but appended with an end_date tag, and any new features should be added and appended with a start_date tag. This would lead to massive amounts of historic information into the future - i.e. nothing that has been correctly mapped need ever be deleted. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
