You could also assume byway and track (tracktype=grade1/grade2, at least) are available for cyclists (neither would be likely to have bicycle access specified).
Richard On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Tobias Knerr <[email protected]> wrote: > Rahkonen Jukka wrote: > > Cartinus wrote: > >> You'd want to exclude cycleway=opposite as well, because that is just > >> removing the oneway restriction for bicycles. > > > > But isn't it still kind of a cycleway and thus worth making it visible > > on a cyclemap? > > I forgot cycleway=opposite in my first reply, but it really isn't a > cycleway. Imo, "cycleway" is a bad choice of key for this, something > like oneway:bicycle=no would be much more appropriate. > Unlike cycleway=opposite_lane and cycleway=opposite_track, there isn't > any road or section of road specifically intended for bicycles, so it > isn't more of a cycleway than any ordinary road. > > Of course, a cyclemap should still make sure to visibly indicate whether > an oneway rule applies to bicycles. > > Tobias Knerr > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
