On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:17:02 +0200, Konrad Skeri wrote: > > [...] > > This is obviously wrong. Yes, we could link those stops with the junction > > in a relation -- but adopting a proper Key:stop stop seems *much* cleaner > > to me. [...] > > Yes, the highway=stop is not a good solution. However, I prefer the > suggested relation instead. > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dstop
I've read the both the wiki and the talk page, and saw no gain over simple tagging, while still adding the burden of maintaining yet-another-relation-type. The talk page also features a comment by Eimai, "Easier method?", which is basically the same as Key:stop. As I wrote there, I still see no difference when talking about the right_of_way of the crossing road. Also, according to Tagwatch, it's less used than Key:stop. But since we're discussing it, I'm open to any comment :-) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
