I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths?
The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks in forests where there is some evidence of foot use but there isn't a nice path as such. Generally I've been using "width=narrow" for such instances. However, that description not always accurate as sometimes the width of the way isn't narrow, it's more that it's an "unfriendly" path e.g. a firebreak covered in rough grass, or a churned-up mud track used perhaps more by logging vehicles than pedestrians. Nonetheless the way is open to pedestrians, and often horses, typically on a permissive basis. Because there are lots of these in the New Forest, near where I live, I'd like to come to a definitive conclusion on this so that rendering can distinguish between "nice" and "not nice" paths. Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
