2009/8/27 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > 2009/8/27 David Earl <[email protected]>: >> On 27/08/2009 17:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> >> Tagging something as a motorway when it isn't signed that way or >> vice-versa just because in someone's opinion it looks a more "important" >> road is a rubbish way of doing it IMO. > > actually a motorway isn't described by physical attributes either: it > is a legal question of what signs are put there. I completely agree > that a motorway is just to tag as such when it has a motorway-sign and > over. There is IMHO nothing to discuss about motorway and the > discussion was never about them. Also footways and cycleways, paths > ecc. are not in the focus, neither are traffic-lights and other stuff > aglomerated in the meantime in the highway-tag. The proposal is about > the grid of interconnections, the road system in general. > > The thing is: how do you tag trunk, primary, secondary, tertiary and > unclassified? They are the aim.
Like http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#International_equivalence, surely? -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
