AFAIK there is really nothing smaller than unclassified unless it is (a) residential - i.e. houses along a significant part of it and not really a route to anywhere except those houses or a nearby similar road, or (b) an urban 'living street' with pedestrian priority (can't remember how to tag - I have never found one round here and the wiki is nearly dead at the moment so I can't check!), or (c) a track - bearing in mind that a track with tracktype=grade1 could also be surface=paved.
Mike Harris > -----Original Message----- > From: Valent Turkovic [mailto:valent.turko...@gmail.com] > Sent: 16 September 2009 19:54 > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] highway=residential for rural ways? > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:34:28 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > > > My understanding is that rural roads ("country lanes" as they are > > called in the UK) should be highway=unclassified. However > if there is > > a small housing estate or residential road in a village, it > should be > > highway=residential. > > How do you then tag roads that are smaller than unclassified, > are narrower or have lesser importance? > > > > -- > pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt > http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ > linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless > registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, > http://counter.li.org. > ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic > > > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
