2009/9/19 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > what do you mean? We are already doing this: lanes=3
That only says how many lanes, it doesn't describe restrictions or properties of individual lanes. > In simple cases you don't need it, and when it get's complex, IMHO > explicit mapping is the only transparent and easy way to solve the > issue. > One of my favourite example is this situation: > http://maps.google.it/maps?hl=de&ie=UTF8&ll=41.866627,12.49679&spn=0.000684,0.001206&t=h&z=20 No, more like this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/images/4/46/Lane_group_example1_screen_2.png > you will get just confusion when you start to count lanes and tag > things like lane:11=oneway, no_right_turn > Usually at crossings you will have different turnrestrictions for > parallel lanes. Lanes are starting and ending (even small ones as for > busses, to turn, etc.). I'm not suggesting to do it that way, I'm suggesting editors show each lane as a parallel way and each lane can be tagged independent of the way. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
