On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Peteris Krisjanis <[email protected]> wrote: >> Camp three: multiple ways representing paths of travel, grouped with a >> "bridge" relation to indicate they share a common bridge. This could >> probably be seen as a compromise, and is (I think) a good interim >> solution, if not a very-long-term solution. >> > > I can suggest to add bridge's physical form to this. Otherwise yeah, > why not. It would also help to indicate where bridge actually starts > and ends to help routing software logic.
By the way, for those interested, the relation we are suggesting is essentially already documented here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
