> The problem connector is also named US81...etc, as well as containing the > routing relation 135 South. I believe that is what disrupted the > routing.
A further clarification - the connection from 81 to 254 would be a secondary_link , since the road to which it connects is secondary. If it connected with another motorway, the connecting road would be a motorway_link. A *_link way usually does not have a name except for unusual cases. As an option (not required for routing), if the connection to 254 is marked as an exit, you would place a motorway_junction and enter the name(s) as shown on the sign, separated by semicolons, and the exit number. Another option is to add a 'ref' tag to the secondary_link with just the exit number. Eventually turn-by-turn instructions could make use of that information. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
