When does zoomlevel 8 get rendered? River Lena for example did not update on zoomlevel 8 since 24. July! (1) No problem for zoomlevel 9 though (2)...
Roman (1) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=61.215&lon=128.018&zoom=8&layers=B000FTF (2) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=61.215&lon=128.018&zoom=9&layers=B000FTF > Send talk mailing list submissions to > talk@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of talk digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Help from Tourist office? (Sam Vekemans) > 2. Re: How to tag dead-ends and how to distinguish them from > incomplete ways (David Paleino) > 3. Re: Help from Tourist office? (Iv?n S?nchez Ortega) > 4. Re: How to tag dead-ends and how to distinguish them from > incomplete ways (Dave F.) > 5. Re: How to tag dead-ends and how to distinguish them from > incomplete ways (David Earl) > 6. Re: How to tag dead-ends and how to distinguish them from > incomplete ways (Dave F.) > 7. Re: Help from Tourist office? (Dave F.) > 8. Re: walking-papers.org is dead? (Michal Migurski) > 9. Re: Satellite for OSM (Morten Kjeldgaard) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:05:50 -0700 > From: Sam Vekemans <acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Help from Tourist office? > To: "k...@vielevisels" <k...@vielevisels.de> > Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org > Message-ID: > <9dbbf3b20909260905u12c7c7cx820b3eea8928a...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > Great idea, > What im working on (for Across Canada). Is actually going ahead and > filling > in those amenities that the typical town-visitor would like to see > (myself). So I will be able to, probably using KOSMOS, create a nice > map > of the town, then just donate the map to the tourist office. And they > can > make copies of it. > > What i would then do is ask the people at the tourist office, for when > they > actually draw on the map, and indicate things which are not listed, to > make > a 'working-copy', so then i can go back to the tourist office at a later > date, and show them (in person) how to edit the map. And make a new > version, and print it off. (Considering we know that most of the time > there are LOTS of things missing on other tourist maps.) :-) > > Alot of the tourist offices i have been to offer a computer with internet > access todo local searches and email. (sometimes for a fee), and some > have > wi-fi. since i use a mini-notebook, it's easy to show people on-the-fly. > > ... at least thats what i plan on doing, once this Canada Import is well > underway. .. Probably for next year. > > Have fun, > Cheers, > Sam Vekemans > Across Canada Trails > > Twitter: @Acrosscanada > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans > > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 6:45 AM, k...@vielevisels <k...@vielevisels.de> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> i recently travelled to a city with nearly 40.000 inhabitants and was >> surprised, that almost no hotels, restaurants and other amenities were >> in >> OSM. >> So I had the idea to contact the tourist office with a short >> introduction >> on OSM and how to tag, to give this to shops, hotels, restaurants and >> so on. >> So with no effort, all these shops can have their business in OSM. >> Did anyone try this? What do you think of the idea? >> Kai >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20090926/64e15498/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:30:15 +0200 > From: David Paleino <d.pale...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] How to tag dead-ends and how to distinguish > them from incomplete ways > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Message-ID: <1365500.atdphls...@home.hanskalabs.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > k...@vielevisels wrote: > >> Hi, >> many people tag ways, which are incomplete and show just the beginning, >> with the note (or FIXME) = stub. In the wiki, the tag noexit=no is >> intended for this. I think it would be helpful have one way to tag this >> and to render both (dead-ends and incomplete ways), to show where work >> has >> to be done. >> >> Any comments on this? > > I agree that using noexit=no is a good thing to do. > >> PS: noexit=no is not without problems, often there are ways which start >> as >> a very good track, but end after some kilometers. So a tag displaying >> that >> only the beginning of the track is displayed, would be better > > Why? If a way/node is noexit=no, you are telling people that this road > continues somewhere, somehow. As I understand it, it could be the same > road, > or another one crossing. The first case, being the same road, applies > here > -- dead end roads where only the beginning has been mapped. > > > Anyways, what's the current way of using noexit=*? I've always used that > on > ways, the wiki suggests that too, but reading the Talk page it seems like > there was some intention to tag the final node with it? Also josm shows > the > dead-end signal when applied to a node. Did I miss something? > > Kindly, > David > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
