2009/9/29 Emilie Laffray <emilie.laff...@gmail.com>: > That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary field to > determine what to display. If the renderer doesn't do that, you will end up > with a map that is poorer in the end. In your case, that would mean > increasing the size of the table produced by osm2pgsql by one extra column. > Overall, you are increasing complexity with little or no benefits. > I am not sure it makes sense in the end since were are getting exactly the > same of information if you are using the tag directly in landuse.
Why is this a problem for tagging exactly? If mapnik wants to pre-process it differently that's fine, but it should have no bearing on the tagging used. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
