Dave Stubbs wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 30 Sep 2009, at 20:46 , Russ Nelson wrote: >>> >>>> No, he is a leader because we respect him. THAT is how leaders in >>>> an anarchic state arise. >>>> >>>> >>> yes he is a leader and as such deserves respect. he should lead some >>> useful and intelligent projects and don't loose a word about this >>> childish 1/0/yes/no/true/false discussions. >>> a consumer of the data has to do a bit more work but this is a small >>> fee for free access to an amazing database. >>> >>> >> The discussion is only childish if the tone of the discussion is childish. >> But if people discuss this issue in a good manner, then it isn't childish. >> >> If we can remove that small fee, why not do it? >> >> What's so hard about standardizing on the boolean values given appropriate >> changes to editor presets, good wiki documentation, and a deprecation period >> for other boolean values? >> > > > what's so hard? > The hard part is figuring out what the hell any of this actually has > to do with the thread topic. > Amazingly tag-standardisation is not even /relevant/ to the original > problem pointed out. > Oh well... wouldn't be the internet if someone wasn't wrong on it. > Did you not read Kyle's post - 29th 15:25 > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
