ed...@billiau.net schrieb: > Frederik said >> All this is possible *within* the existing OSM framework and without any >> strong leader telling us where to go. I really do encourage you and all >> those calling for leadership to get together, form your own advisory >> board or tagging committee or whatever, create the structures you think >> are required, and then offer them for voluntary use by the community. >> > > This is likely to result in several insular communities. In particular I > am considering that au mappers would write a tight set of guidelines for > mapping and, as an example, we wouldn't have to worry about "residential > vs unclassified in rural areas" for any other country - we would define > our own strategy and stick to it. > If Au does that, and the Argentinians make their own set of preferences, > and other groups do the same, we will have a project with multiple forks. > I don't really want to split the project, but if it becomes the only way > to peace it will happen by itself.
Funny to read: "likely to result", "we will have" ... We already have insular communities (e.g. using highway=unclassified for this or for that or for something different), we have a special definition page for germany tagging and ... Problem: "we" just don't stick to definitions or change it every few weeks/months. Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
