Did you read all I wrote? What do you think I mean with "If we want to specify the type you are of course welcome to do that, e.g. bridge=viaduct or electrified=contact_line" and "These are only examples where yes|no could be used. Other descriptive values are still valid, e.g. bridge=viaduct or electrified=contact_line"?
We should replace a quantilbillion of different boolean values with yes|no. Instead of bridge=ja, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=japp, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=da, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=jepp, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=jupp, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=oui, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=sant, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=riktigt, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=recht, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=korrekt, use bridge=yes Instead of bridge=påhederochsamvete, use bridge=yes But if it is an viaduct and you want to specify it, then use bridge=viaduct. I _nowhere_ wrote that bridge should only accept boolean values, but if we mean to input a boolean value, we should have ONE boolean value. cheers, Konrad 2009/10/4 John Smith <[email protected]>: > 2009/10/4 Konrad Skeri <[email protected]>: >> boolean values are allowed. Instead of bridge=jomenvisst we should use >> bridge=yes, and instead of electrified=naltaseotroligt we should use > > Bridge isn't listed as boolean only, you can also have bridge=viaduct > which I've used a few times. > > Other values listed on the map features page are aquaduct and swing. > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
