On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:02:05 +1100 Liz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Joseph Booker wrote: > > Not sure if you are trolling or just > > not aware of the wiki, but I'll give the benefit of the doubt and > > assume the latter. > > I wouldn't say that this guy is trolling at all, but has put a lot of > thought into his mail. > I don't find your quick answers helpful to myself, who is interested > to see a way forward from these discussions, not sideways or > backwards.
Figured a sideways look would help for perspective. Just wanted to make clear that there is an accepted schema, which may not be as strictly enforced as the original poster would like but matches most of his thoughts. The similarity of his ideas with the way things are currently run (excluding the "classes" of tags based on what kind of values they accept) with the obvious desire for controlling clients is what made me think this was trollish, but like I said, I'm just going to assume he was unaware of the wiki and the procedures done there to formalize the tags in the database. Egil, sorry if I came off as rude. I just think your email not accounting for the wiki serving (maybe ineffectively, that is another discussion) the purpose of your strict "tagging" mail group reflects some misunderstandings. If I am wrong, please let me know and I would be happy to offer comments on your proposal itself. -- Joseph Booker
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
