On 05/10/09 11:04, Dave Stubbs wrote: > As the person whose first came up with a no-names map for London > (well, actually it was a named map of London, turned into a nonames > map on SteveC's suggestion), I have an *official leadership > announcement* to make: > > There shall be no tagging of unnamed roads. It is not important. They > show up on the no-names map -- big deal -- its a mapping aid not a > holy grail of "there shall be no highlighted roads". Just deal with > it.
So why did you make the noname map in the first place, if it's not important? Have you changed your mind about its usefulness? Gerv _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
