Hi, >> What exactly, in your opinion, should the talk list be used for >> exactly, now that everything has been branched off to it's own list? > > From a quick scan through the last couple of months, perhaps stuff > like: feeds, Software Freedom Day, GPS in planes, 35 servers from > Wikimedia Foundation, persistence of ids, mugs, a campaign about Google > imagery, the Economist, Monopoly, the evolution of a map through time, a > countryside mapping tool, cartography, relations vs superways, what to > map first, OpenStreetView, getting field data, Poland, our own > satellite, translations, definitive maps, iPhones, coastline quality, > the amount of water on the planet, adjoining geometries, EGNOS, funny > posters, what "blocks" mean, maps for the blind, WMS, national > boundaries, the site title bar, national websites, expanding the API, > Bing, spam, Panogate, automatic simplification, GPS accuracy, search > engines indexing OSM, Local Chapters update, RC helicopters, > multipolygon rendering, meeting minutes, video surveying, historic > mapping, duplicate ways, and Twitter. In short everything that is interesting to the general OSM community but not long-winded enough to warrant a separate list.
Is that so hard to grasp, John? Patrick "Petschge" Kilian _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
