On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > Anthony wrote: >> Do advanced multipolygons have to have an inner? > > No.
Great. > Personally, I am hoping that we will (re)introduce a proper area data type > some day because even though the multipolygons were a good idea at the time, > they do seem a bit clumsy now. What would be the advantage of an area data type? Would this be a separate table or just a type of relation? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
