Pieren writes: > Richard is convinced that the content of the photos is not protected > and I agree on that point. But he just decides to ignore all the > investments spent to rectify and georeference these photos on which > his derivative work is based. And this investment and work is > protected.
Richard isn't ignoring this. The law ignores it. Or do you think there's case law which he hasn't cited? -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
